Magic City Morning Star

Forum | Wiki | Advertising | RSS Feed | About Us 

Last Updated: Oct 8, 2009 - 12:32:13 AM 

Millinocket, East Millinocket, Medway, and all of Maine!
Staff Login
Donate towards our web hosting bill!

Front Page 
  News
  -- Local
  -- State
  -- National
  Community
  -- Historical Society
  -- Maine Elks
  -- Maine Grange
  Business
  -- IRS News
  -- Win at Work
  Education
  -- History
  Tech Notes
  Entertainment
  -- Comics
  International
  -- R.P. BenDedek
  -- Kenneth Tellis
  Outdoors
  Sports
  Features
  -- D. R. Crews
  -- J. G. Fabiano
  -- M Stevens-David
  -- Down the Road
  -- Laura on Life
  Christianity
  Obituaries
  Today in History
  Maine Politics
  -- Susan Collins
  -- Michael Michaud
  -- Olympia Snowe
  Opinion
  -- Editor's Desk
  -- Guest Column
  -- Scheme of Things
  -- Thomas Brewton
  -- Stephen Crockett
  -- Michael Devolin
  -- Tom DeWeese
  -- Ed Feulner
  -- William Jud
  -- Jim Kouri
  -- Alyce Maragus
  -- Julie Smithson
  -- Paul Streitz
  -- J. Grant Swank
  -- Nathan Tabor
  -- Doug Wrenn
  -- Tony Zizza
  Letters
  Agenda 21
  Book Reviews
  -- Old Embers
  Notices
  Archive
  Discontinued


As Maine Goes
Restore The Republic - The Home of the Freedom Movement!
www.rockymountaintrail.com
Alliance for the Separation of School and State

William Jud

Is this Legislation Constitutional?
By William Jud
Oct 8, 2009 - 12:17:16 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

The United States Congress has been running hog-wild for decades, creating laws that violate the U. S. Constitution, particularly the Bill Of Rights (Amendments 1 - 10).

As Henry Lamb reports, Michael Oberndorf, Legislative Chairman for Freedom 21, made a most interesting discovery on his recent visit to the Congress folks at Washington, D. C.

Michael Oberndorf was making the rounds of legislative offices, talking with elected officials and staff members. One of the discussion topics was Congressional Responsibility for ensuring that all bills and enacted laws are Constitutionally Compliant.

Representative Ron Paul (R-TX) has been trying for years to have Congress adopt the Enumerated Powers Act, HR 1207, that requires a simple statement of Constitutional Compliance to be inserted at the beginning of a bill's text. Essentially, the statement would say something such as 'The full content of this bill is authorized by Section 'X' of the United States Constitution.'

A bill that does not fully qualify as Constitutionally Compliant is a direct violation of the Constitutional Authority granted to Congress and ought not be under consideration at all. Additionally, a bill or law that violates Constitutional Authority renders everyone involved with that legislation in violation of the Oath Of Office and requires immediate and permanent dismissal of all those people from elected office, retroactive to the first such violation, even if that first violation occurred years or even decades ago. Removal could extend to involved members of the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the President.

Michael Oberndorf made a most important discovery while talking with a Congressional aide for Rep. David Price (D-NC). The aide said that the requirement for Constitutional Compliance already exists within the Rules of the House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, Rule XIII, Calendars and Committee Reports; Content of Reports, 3.(d)(1), which states,

"Each report of a committee on a public bill or public joint resolution shall contain the following: A statement citing the specific powers granted to Congress in the Constitution to enact the law proposed by the bill or joint resolution."

There also are other requirements for estimating and reporting the cost that the legislation would impose.

I looked up Rules of the House of Representatives (http://clerk.house.gov/legislative/rules111/111th.pdf) and found the RULE listed on Page 25. Because of my local computer setting, the material actually appeared on my monitor on Page 28.

So there it is! The U. S. House of Representatives already has a Rule that requires listing Constitutional Authority for a legislative item in the Committee Report on the bill concerning that item.

Now, we need to pressure Congress to follow its own rules and turn the Rule for the Committee into a Statute concerning all legislative bills and actions, forcing members of the House and Senate to state straightforwardly, at the start of the bill's text, by what Constitutional Authority the bill is written, or to admit straightforwardly that the bill violates the authority granted to Congress by the U. S. Constitution and violates the Oath Of Office of everyone connected with the bill.

William Jud


© Copyright 2002-2009 by Magic City Morning Star

Top of Page

William Jud
Latest Headlines
Obamacare Unconstitutional
A Constitutional Weapon to fight Democrat Party Radicalism
Raising our sights on the 2010 election
Desperately Seeking Nobody
Overlooking the Obvious

Animal Den - Gift Shop for Animal Lovers!
A Dinosaur of Education - a blog by James Fabiano.
Buy Alvina's book now with PayPal
Buy The Call of Katahdin from Amazon.com
Wysong Foods - Pets and People Too
1-800-PetMeds
Buy Weapon in Heaven from Amazon.com
Different products for unique babies!
Save on Outdoor Gear at the Outlet
Altrec Logo: Free Shipping
Caribou Coffee Company

Google
 
Web magic-city-news.com