Magic City Morning Star

Advertising | RSS Feed | About Us 

Last Updated: Oct 13, 2013 - 12:38:22 AM 

An eclectic mix of news and information
Staff Login
Donate towards our web hosting bill!

Front Page 
  -- Local
  -- State
  -- National
  -- IRS News
  -- Win at Work
  -- History
  Tech Notes
  -- Comics
  -- R.P. BenDedek
  -- Kenneth Tellis
  -- M Stevens-David
  -- Down the Road
  Today in History
  -- Editor's Desk
  -- Guest Column
  -- Scheme of Things
  -- Michael Devolin
  -- Tom DeWeese
  -- Ed Feulner
  -- Jim Kouri
  -- Julie Smithson
  -- J. Grant Swank
  -- Doug Wrenn
  Agenda 21
  Book Reviews
  -- Old Embers

Web Directory Reviews
WDR Directory of Directories
Restore The Republic - The Home of the Freedom Movement!

Tech Notes

EFF, ACLU Move to Intervene in Wikileaks Case
By Electronic Frontier Foundation
Feb 27, 2008 - 9:55:43 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

SAN FRANCISCO, CA -- The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California (ACLU-Northern California) Tuesday filed a motion to intervene in a lawsuit where a federal judge ordered the disabling of one of the domain names associated with "Wikileaks," a website designed to give whistleblowers a forum for posting materials of public concern.

In early February, Swiss bank Julius Baer filed suit in federal district court against Wikileaks for hosting 14 allegedly leaked documents regarding personal banking transactions of Julius Baer customers.  Also sued was Wikileaks' domain name registrar, Dynadot LLC.  On February 15, following a stipulation between Julius Baer and Dynadot, the court issued a permanent injunction, disabling the domain name and preventing that domain name from being transferred to any other registrar.

"Dynadot's private agreement to disable access to its customer's domain name -- and the court's endorsement of that agreement -- raise serious First Amendment concerns," EFF Staff Attorney Matt Zimmerman.  "This unwarranted injunction should remind everyone who hosts critical information on the Web that such information may only remain accessible as long as your service provider or registrar is willing to stand up for you against obviously overreaching legal attacks."

Wikileaks permits third parties to post corporate and government documents that they believe expose wrongdoing. For example, in the past year individuals have posted materials documenting alleged human rights abuses in China and political corruption in Kenya.  The court's order effectively prevents readers who are only familiar with Wikileaks through the domain name from accessing any material on the site.

"Julius Baer's private dispute regarding a former employee's alleged violation of a confidentiality agreement does not warrant this attempt to block access to all material hosted on Wikileaks," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Matt Zimmerman.  "The First Amendment rights of readers who have a legitimate interest in the materials posted on the website simply cannot be treated as acceptable collateral damage to the bank's claims."

In the papers filed Tuesday, the intervenors -- including the EFF, the ACLU, the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), and Wikileaks user Jordan McCorkle -- asked the court for permission to intervene in order to dissolve the injunction disabling the domain name.  The papers were filed in consultation with and on behalf of the intervenors by Steven Mayer of the law firm of Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin.  Other attorneys on the case include Christopher Kao and Shaudy Danaye-Elmi of Howard Rice; Zimmerman, Cindy Cohn, and Kurt Opsahl of EFF; and Aden Fine and Ann Brick of the ACLU and ACLU-Northern California, respectively.

At 9:00 a.m. on Friday, February 29, a federal judge in San Francisco will hear arguments regarding a related issue: whether to extend a temporary restraining order aimed at preventing the further distribution of the 14 disputed Julius Baer documents.  A hearing to address Tuesday's motion to intervene and subsequent motion to dissolve the domain name permanent injunction has not yet been scheduled.

For information regarding the February 29 hearing, please contact

For the full motion to intervene:

For this release:

About EFF

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading civil liberties organization working to protect rights in the digital world. Founded in 1990, EFF actively encourages and challenges industry and government to support free expression and privacy online. EFF is a member-supported organization and maintains one of the most linked-to websites in the world at

Editor's Note: It's nice to see the ACLU on the right side of something for a change. -- Ken Anderson

© Copyright 2002-2013 by Magic City Morning Star

Top of Page

Tech Notes
Latest Headlines
Big Problems with the Big Bang
The Simoni Lift
Microsoft Explorer web browser allows "remote, unauthorized attack"
BBB Warning: Microsoft Ends Support of XP
Cyber Security Awareness Month - Protect your identity online

A Dinosaur of Education - a blog by James Fabiano.
Shobe Studios
Wysong Foods - Pets and People Too