|
From Magic City Morning Star R.P. BenDedek
The Math and Science of the King's Calendar Series: The Difficulties of History We sometimes tend to think that our knowledge of history is based on irrefutable evidence, but as pointed out by Sir Alan Gardiner (1961) [James Et.Al 1991 p.222] in reference to Egyptian History, our knowledge is based in a collection of rags and tatters. That there are probably many errors and circular arguments in relation to ancient history is attested to by many, including Colin Renfrew, Professor of Archaeology, Cambridge University (James Et. Al. 1991 : foreword pages.xiii-xv) As pointed out by Peet. T.E. (1924. p 75): "Archaeology is not an exact science, and deals more often in probabilities and possibilities than in irrefutable demonstrations.' Unfortunately however, anti-Biblical bias is strong, and some historians take a less than scientific approach to their work. For some, admitting that the scriptural record of history might be right, seems to be sufficient incentive to ensure that the Scriptural Record be summarily rejected. James et.al. (1991, p.162) are quite straightforward in their criticisms of Academic "poor methodology, hypercritical treatment of Scripture, blindness, prejudice and a sectarian like rejection of the Biblical Record". Whilst we might not blame Academics for distrusting the Biblical Material, What is hypocritical is that many of these same Academics will quote the very Scriptures which they consider to be fictional, to support their many and various hypotheses. With this in mind, let's take a brief look at Adad-Nirari III. Background information on Adad-Nirari III as found on the internet. Assyria Part Eight By George Godspeed:
Israel and the Assyrians (Quartz Hill School of Theology) http://www.theology.edu/lec20.htm
Christian Answers Net : Iraq : Tell al-Rimah : http://www.christiananswers.net/q-abr/abr-iraq.html
Encyclopaedia Britannica Online : http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-55455/history-of-Mesopotamia#361408.hook
King's Calendar Chronology Adad-Nirari III commenced to reign in 811 BCE or 810 BCE (Bright, 1981, p.255 - 811 BCE - & - Miller & Hayes, 1986, p.291 - 810) According to current chronology, Adad-Nirari III commenced a series of western campaigns (toward Syria / Palestine) between 805 BCE. and 803 BCE. although Miller & Hayes, [1986, p.298] place this at 796 BCE. The Saba'a Inscription mention of Adad-Nirari's 5th year (806/05 BCE), appears to indicate that it was in that year that he reached Damascus. Some academics think that reference to his fifth year may only imply that he commenced his campaigns in this year, not that he reached Damascus in that year. Reason for doubt concerns the relationship that existed between Damascus, Israel and Judah. The Rimah Stela mentions Amaziah of Judah and Jehoash of Israel as paying tribute to Adad-Nirari III, but currently no one places Jehoash on the throne of Israel until several years later than Adad-Nirari's 5th year. Dates for the Reign of Jehoash of Israel.
According to the King's Calendar reconstruction Jehoash of Israel commenced his sole rule in 807/06 BCE, just prior to the commencement of Adad-Nirari's Western Campaigns into Northern Syria. This is the very year that the Biblical Narrative records that the King of Syria invaded Judah, threatened Jerusalem, and wounded Joash of Judah (2 Chronicles 24:23-24). Since Amaziah commenced reigning in the second year of Jehoash of Israel, his father Joash of Judah died in the first year of Jehoash of Israel. His death (arising as it did from a Syrian invasion - 2 Chronicles 24:23-24), reasonably demonstrates that the Syrians were still in control of Israel until 806 BCE. With regard to the timing of Adad-Nirari's conquering of Damascus, his defeat of Ben Hadad III, and collection of Tribute from Joash of Israel, Roux (1982, p.279) places it at the very beginning of the western campaigns 806/05 BCE., while Bright (1981, p.256) dates it to 802 BCE, and Miller & Hayes ( 1986, p.298 ) put it in 796 BCE during Adad-Nirari's last western Campaign. Possible Biblical Redaction Error If the event did occur in 806 BCE., and Joash of Israel paid tribute to Assyria, this would tend to negate the Biblical narrative of an invasion of Judah by Syria. It could however be supposed that the tribute received from Jehoash of Samaria [Rimah Stele], was instead received from Joash of Judah, and the biblical redactors incorrectly identified the Syrians instead of the Assyrians [2 Chronicles.24:23]. There is Biblical precedent for this type of Error. For those who see an objection
Summary The King's Calendar has actually no interest at all in Adad-Nirari III or his inscriptions. The only interest it has is to apply a scientific (mathematical) methodology to the Synchronous chronological information provided in the Bible for the Kings of Israel and Judah, and to see how the results fit what we have accepted as the History of the Ancient Near East. The King's Calendar demonstrates that following the synchronisms provided in the Books of Kings and Chronicles does put Jehoash of Israel on the Throne by 806 BCE, thereby making possible the Primary Text reading of the Saba'a Inscription that in Adad-Nirari's 5th year (806/05 BCE), he reached Damascus. This is not to say that it could not have been later toward 802 BCE, but as this date is only preferred because Historians are unable to put Jehoash and Amaziah on their thrones by 806 BCE, Primary Text Reading suggests that 802 BCE is incorrect.
List of KingsCalendar Academic Articles at Magic City R.P.Bendedek Email: rpbendedek@hotmail.com Bibliography
___________________________________________________
Academic Articles at KingsCalendar Publishing. Co. "The King's Calendar" is a chronological study of the historical books of the Bible (Kings and Chronicles), Josephus, Seder Olam Rabbah, and the (Essene) Damascus Document of The Dead Sea Scrolls. © Copyright 2002-2007 by Magic City Morning Star |
