Ajai Sahni writes, "There is no locus of terrorism. The locus of terrorism is wherever the ideologies of terrorism penetrate, wherever they find supporters and sympathizers." Since the Muslim invasion of the West and Islam’s exploitation of our accommodative culture, there is no geographical centre of operations for Islamic terrorism. Yet another "expert" on terrorism, Dr. Marc Sageman, the author of the 2003 study on al-Qaeda, Understanding Terror Networks, writes of the doctors involved in the recent terror attacks in Britain, "These doctors remind me of the second wave of al-Qaeda leadership... They are the best and the brightest who went West to study, and they were radicalized there."

Let’s be clear, these doctors were not "radicalized" in the West, a statement which has already been misconstrued as meaning that Western culture by some obscure means contributes to the Muslim terrorist’s decision to murder enmasse and indiscriminately Western civilians within the borders of their very own country. No, these Muslim terrorists were simply obeying tenets of the Koran; these Muslims were simply acting out the essence of Islam, the substance of which commands all Muslims to subjugate, by any means possible, all Muslim and non-Muslim opposition to its goal of pan-Islamic domination of the world.

Islam’s dreams are not only big, but dastardly. The perpetually violent manifestations of this religion are proof of this, which should be for Islam’s apologists - but is not - a discomposing reality. Western political protagonists and their media-hungry "experts" like Daniel Pipes steadfastly refuse to publicly acknowledge that the vast majority of Muslims immigrants to the West have not the slightest interest in assimilation. Rather their collective vision is to transmogrify every remaining Western democracy into another of the barbaric, sharia-effectuated, androcentric autocracies prevalent in the Middle East and Asia. Those Muslim doctors arrested in London and Glasgow are not at all the "second wave of al-Qaeda" but rather a mere segment of the broader and intransigent, proliferating mass of those religious whose Koran decries all Western values (one of which is the preservation of life) as corrupted by all things outside Islam and the Arab domain of influence. As pointed out by Ajai Sahni, the Muslim terrorist’s goal is "the entire world of unbelievers." These doctors, far from being extensions of al-Qaeda’s terrorist brotherhood, are nothing more than well-educated, cultured, and "conscientious" Muslims replicating al-Qaeda’s methods. Muslim see: Muslim do.

There is no "locus of terrorism." There is only Islam and the Koran, which is the source of all Islamic terrorism. The "moderate Muslim" does not exist. A "moderate Muslim" is effectively the Muslim who has not yet become so enamoured by the edicts of his Koran that he would actually kill those whom it decries as unworthy of life itself. These Muslim doctors, lo and behold, were not the "moderates" their colleagues reckoned them to be, but were, contrarily, in their heart of hearts adherents of the purest form of Islam, which is terrorism. Michael Jenkins, a counter-intelligence expert, explains that, "What we’re seeing tells us that ideology can trump morality, humanity and, in this case, the Hippocratic Oath."

However, from the Muslim side of the coin we hear from Tarek Fatah, a Muslim activist based in Toronto, who somehow justifies the actions of these doctors by rationalizing that, "By devoting yourself and your resources to jihad, you are giving your worldly estate to charity. In their mindset it’s the equivalent if being Bill Gates." Excuse me? The Judeo-Christian concept of charity promotes the preservation of humanity, not the extermination of it. Moreover, Bill Gates and his wife, to their credit, are occupied with uplifting their fellow human beings, not burying them. Only a Muslim activist could conjure up such an obscene justification of Islamic terrorism. The apple never falls far from the tree.

Written by Michael Devolin