Last week, President Barack Obama and Secretary of Defense
Leon Panetta unveiled a new strategic guidance that reflects the
nation's 21st Century defense needs and secures America's leadership for
the future, but military critics liken his proposals to playing Russian
roulette with U.S. national security.
The U.S. Defense and State Departments continue to work side-by-side
to bring the full range of American assets to bear on U.S. foreign
policy. As the new strategy notes, meeting security challenges cannot be
the work of our military alone, according to Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton.
"Diplomacy and development are equal partners with defense in our
smart power approach to promoting American interests and values abroad,
building up our economic prosperity, and protecting our national
security," said Secretary Clinton.
This new guidance is a critical element in the nation's integrated
approach to strengthening American leadership in a changing world. It
enhances the capabilities and relationships necessary to lead and meet
national responsibilities for years to come, Pentagon officials stated.
In addition, it promotes U.S. strategic priorities, including
sustaining a global presence while strengthening the country's focus on
the Asia-Pacific region; deterring our adversaries and fulfilling our
security commitments; investing in critical alliances and partnerships,
including NATO; combating violent extremists and defending human dignity
around the world; and preserving our ability to respond quickly to
emerging threats.
"As we move forward with this strategy, we will continue to consult
our allies and partners to address our shared concerns, seize new
opportunities, and bolster global stability," Secretary Clinton stated.
"On defense spending, a huge amount of their savings on the
discretionary side came out of defense spending," Obama said during a
press conference.
"Most of the reporters attending Thursday's Obama press conference
were too young to remember that President Bill Clinton reduced the
nation's deficit by drastically cutting defense. In fact, he called it
the 'peace dividend.' Obama is now counting on people not remembering
those cuts, as he duplicates the Bill Clinton strategy," said former
military intelligence officer Mike Snopes.
Members of Obama's Fiscal Commission had proposed cuts that would
have come terminated or cutback several multi-billion dollar weapon
systems, such as the F-35 fighter jet, the V-22 aircraft, and a new
Marine Corps amphibious landing craft.
"I think we need to cut defense, but as commander-in-chief, I've got
to make sure that we're cutting it in a way that recognizes we're still
in the middle of a war," Obama said during a press conference.
President Obama last Spring had requested $400 billion in national
security cuts by 2023 to help with deficit-reduction efforts. During
White House-congressional debt-ceiling talks, there was talk of even
larger military budget cuts with the numbers reaching about $800 billion
over 10 years.
But after word leaked out that the Obama administration would all but
gut the U.S. defense and national security programs, critics blasted
the White House for its myopic view of threats the U.S. faces.
Truth be told, because entitlement spending has tripled while defense
spending declined as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP),
entitlement spending (Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security) is now 10
percent of GDP, whereas defense spending is only 5 percent.
As documented in The Heritage Foundation's 2011 Budget Chart Book,
even eliminating all defense spending would not solve the federal
spending crisis. Since 1976, annual entitlement spending has exceeded
defense spending, even with the cost of wars such as Iraq and
Afghanistan.
"Don't be surprised to hear President Obama attempt to sound more
like a hawk as we approach 2012. Having failed to oversee an economic
comeback, he will attempt to sound presidential in foreign affairs.
He'll attempt to sound more patriotic with some audiences and his news
media cheerleaders will help," said political strategist Mike Baker.
Jim Kouri,
CPP, formerly Fifth Vice-President, is currently a Board Member of the
National Association of Chiefs of Police, an editor for
ConservativeBase.com, and he's a columnist for Examiner.com. In
addition, he's a blogger for the Cheyenne, Wyoming Fox News Radio
affiliate KGAB (www.kgab.com) and editor of Conservative Base Magazine (www.conservativebase.com). Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty.
He's former chief at a New York City
housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed "Crack City" by
reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as
director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of
security for several major organizations. He's also served on the
National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers
throughout the country. Kouri writes for many police and security
magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and
others. He's a news writer and columnist for AmericanDaily.Com,
MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he's syndicated by AXcessNews.Com.
Kouri appears regularly as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio
news and talk shows including Fox News Channel, Oprah, McLaughlin
Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, etc.
To subscribe to Kouri's newsletter write to COPmagazine@aol.com and write "Subscription" on the subject line.