I went to the US Consulate this week to take care of certain
family business. It was a thoroughly unpleasant experience. I think it
is ironic that two days after my extremely unpleasant experience at
the consulate, State Department Spokeswoman Victoria Nuland refused to
say what the capital of Israel is. It was ironic because anyone who
visits the consulate knows that the US's position on Jerusalem is in
perfect alignment with that of Israel's worst enemies.
Last time I went to the consulate was in 2007. At that time
the building was located in the middle of an Arab neighborhood in
eastern Jerusalem. It was unpleasant. In fact it was fairly frightening.
Once inside the building I couldn't shake the feeling that the
Americans had gone out of their way to make Israeli-American Jews
feel uncomfortable and vaguely threatened.
But then, I was able to console myself with the thought that the
US has been upfront about its rejection of Israel's right to assert
its sovereignty over eastern Jerusalem. By treating Jews as foreigners
in their capital city and behaving as though it belongs to the Arabs
by among other things hiring only Arabs as local employees, the
US officials on site were simply implementing a known US policy. True,
I deeply oppose the policy, but no one was asking me, and no one
was hiding anything from me.
The new consulate is much different, and much worse. The
State Department opened its new consulate in Jerusalem in October 2010.
It is located in the Jewish neighborhood of Arnona. It was built on
the plot that Israel allocated for the US Embassy after Congress
passed Jerusalem Embassy Act in 1995 requiring the US government to move
its embassy to Jerusalem. I read that construction began in 2004.
I haven't been able to find out whether when construction began it was to
build the embassy or a new consulate so I don't know yet whether the Bush
administration thought it was building an embassy that the Obama
administration turned into a consulate or if the Bush administration
thought it was building a consulate that the Obama administration
completed.
Whatever the case, the fact that the building that was supposed to
bean expression of US recognition of Israel's capital in Jerusalem
is being used as the consulate is an unvarnished act of aggression against
Israel and Congress.
If I am not mistaken, the US Consulate General in Jerusalem is
the only US consulate in the world that is not subordinate to the
embassy in the country where it is located. When it was located in a
hostile Arab neighborhood in eastern Jerusalem, the fact that it was
not subordinate to the US Embassy in Tel Aviv was upsetting. But it
was also easily justified in light of US policy of not recognizing
Israeli sovereignty in eastern, southern and northern Jerusalem.
But Arnona is in western Jerusalem. It is a Jewish neighborhood
that even the most radical Israeli leftists don't envision transferring
to the Palestinians in any peace deal. Putting the consulate in Arnona
-and on the site reserved for the embassy no less - is the
clearest expression of American rejection of all Israeli sovereign rights
to Jerusalem imaginable.
And the fact that it is located in the heart of a Jewish neighborhood is far from the only problem with the building.
Israelis who live in Jerusalem and need US consular services
are required to go to the consulate in Jerusalem. You can't just go to
Tel Aviv to avoid the unpleasantness. This again is due to the fact
that the US does not recognize ANY Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem.
From the State Department's perspective, people who live in Jerusalem
--even in Arnona and Rehavia and Ein Kerem etc. -- live in a
DIFFERENT COUNTRY from people who live in Tel Aviv and Netanya. We can no
more receive services from the embassy in Tel Aviv than we can
receive services from the embassy in Amman.
I will be writing more about the US's adversarial treatment of
Israel as embodied in its treatment of Jerusalem in next week's
Jerusalem Post column. But suffice it to say here that Victoria
Nuland's statement to AP reporter Matt Lee, (posted here (The State Department's Jerusalem Syndrome) in case you miss edit), is a true depiction of America's policy on Jerusalem - and thoughbit, on Israel.
Caroline Glick
www.carolineglick.com
This article arrived via the Newsletter from:
Women For Israel's Tomorrow (Women in Green)
POB 7352, Jerusalem 91072, Israel
Email: wfit2@womeningreen.org
http://www.womeningreen.org