Magic City Morning Star

Advertising | RSS Feed | About Us 

Last Updated: Mar 12, 2014 - 7:15:57 AM 

An eclectic mix of news and information
Staff Login
Donate towards our web hosting bill!

Front Page 
  News
  -- Local
  -- State
  -- National
  Community
  Business
  -- IRS News
  -- Win at Work
  Education
  -- History
  Tech Notes
  Entertainment
  -- Comics
  International
  -- R.P. BenDedek
  -- Kenneth Tellis
  Outdoors
  Sports
  Features
  -- M Stevens-David
  -- Down the Road
  Christianity
  Today in History
  Opinion
  -- Editor's Desk
  -- Guest Column
  -- Scheme of Things
  -- Michael Devolin
  -- Tom DeWeese
  -- Ed Feulner
  -- Jim Kouri
  -- Julie Smithson
  -- J. Grant Swank
  -- Doug Wrenn
  Letters
  Agenda 21
  Book Reviews
  -- Old Embers
  Notices
  Archive
  Discontinued


Web Directory Reviews
WDR Directory of Directories
Restore The Republic - The Home of the Freedom Movement!

Guest Column

Religious Freedom, Catholic Style
By Paul Moser
Mar 12, 2014 - 6:17:07 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

As a member of the great herd of Recovering Catholics, I have been fascinated by the recent outrage expressed by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops regarding "religious freedom." That phrase has become a rallying cry as they press a lawsuit against the Obama administration, insisting that they not be obliged to offer women's reproductive health services as part of the insurance package provided to employees of Catholic institutions--even though those institutions are not required to pay for them. These health services, of course, include abortion services as well as birth control methods that might well reduce the number of abortions.

Listening to the bishops' fulminations, it's hard to avoid a few rich ironies implicit in their current position, unbending and absolute as it is.

Most obvious is the fact that at no time in history has the Church itself ever provided "religious freedom" to anyone. It was never in the playbook. Even the most casual student of European history knows that over many centuries, wherever it held dominion, the Church was especially zealous in rooting out even the slightest deviations from its orthodoxy. From the Arians to the Cathars to Galileo to indigenous peoples of the New World, the Church never hesitated to use torture and death, or the threat of it, to achieve at least outward conformity. Powered by the winning combination of certainty and self-righteousness, the conformity requirement might still be in force today had powerful monarchs not stripped a grotesquely materialistic papacy of its temporal power, and the Enlightenment not stripped it of its intellectual power. Had none of that history come to pass, and had Spanish settlers populated the shores of North America, it is likely we would all be speaking Spanish and living in a theocracy that, though Catholic, would have a lot in common with present-day Iran.

So it's pretty rich to contemplate the idea that the American bishops have waxed indignant about a freedom they enjoy only because it was established by those who threw off the shackles that Catholicism worked so long and hard to bind humanity with. Some fine black humor. The Church's position is a little like the instigator of a lynch mob now demanding his rights of due process.

But let's give the Church a mulligan on this. Sure, it exercised its power in shockingly brutal ways, but it is equally true that, until the 19th century in Europe, mass killings fueled by religious intolerance were not limited to Catholics. Lutherans, Calvinists, Huguenots, and others got in on the action. And today, even when the red Gucci slipper is on the other foot and the Church is without secular power to impose its will on Americans, the U.S. government could obviously never react in the old, barbaric ways. Because it's just not American in the end, is it? It is too far outside of the Enlightenment tradition we inherited from thinkers such as Locke, Hume, and Diderot. In our world, so much more enlightened than that of rigid, grim orthodoxy, everyone deserves a hearing, a chance to make their case. And so: the Church now receives the due process it never previously granted anyone.

Another irony that makes the bishops' religious freedom case and its attendant lawsuit more embarrassing for them to pursue is the position of their leader, Pope Francis I. In recent months, the new pope has done more than prod the bishops to move in another direction: he's put the sharp end of a pin in their balloon. He has done this not by assaulting the sand-bagged, entrenched position the bishops have staked out--which is ultimately his own doctrinal position as well--but by blurring the edges of the issues, pointing out what he sees as the real "heart of the Christian message" in a bid to improve the battered public image of the Church.

He is quite correct in telling the bishops that it is wrongheaded to obsess about cherry-picked issues such as birth-control and same-sex marriage, casting into outer darkness all those not in lockstep with their version of the Christian message, rather than emphasizing constructive dialogue with people of good will. Good for him. He is also telling them that the "idolatry of money" is an ultimately corrosive force in society. Great. But, if in continuing to cultivate his image as the love child of Jesus and Will Rogers, he means that every single steely-eyed, rule- crazy, dogma-drunk cleric needs a wakeup call, then he is including himself and the Church as a whole in that exhortation/indictment. And, of course, the weight of history and Church bureaucracy would be a millstone around his neck in trying to steer a new course to address real issues confronting real people.

It is more than a longshot to expect even a "liberal" pope (great oxymoron!), much less the thoroughly fossilized U.S. bishops, to awaken to the truth: that their doctrinal obsession with topics like clerical celibacy or the ordination of women is particularly absurd when contrasted with their silence in the face of cuts to U.S. government programs like free school lunches for disadvantaged children, or early childhood education--while huge subsidies and tax loopholes are left in place for the wealthiest citizens. It's about as un-Christian as you can get. Without simply going back to burning people at the stake, I mean.

Paul Moser


Paul Moser
is the author of the new book, T-Bull and The Lost Men, which puts an unexpected twist into classic story of Peter Pan to take on a variety of societal ills including unbridled capitalism and dogmatic religion. He was brought up as a gonzo Catholic, including eight years of Catholic grammar school where he served as an altar boy, and four years at a Jesuit high school.

Overview

Have you heard the one about the lesbian pixie called Tinker Bull, who takes on a shipload of Roman Catholic pirates without the help of her old friend Peter Plan, who has become an investment banker? Or the one about the Crocodazzi, an insatiable investigative journalist who happens to be a crocodile?

The punch lines are in the story called T-Bull and the Lost Men, a funhouse mirror masquerading as a book. Of course it's more than just punch lines: there's its educational slant, too! Like discovering how certain pirates can be natural capitalists, or even how organic pixie dust is made.

It is satire that cuts close to the skull and crossbones of organized religion, capitalism, academia, and the media.

T-Bull and the Lost Men
by Paul Moser
ISBN-13: 9780984794126
Publisher: Venial Press
Publication date: 12/10/2013
Pages: 138


© Copyright 2002-2013 by Magic City Morning Star

Top of Page

Guest Column
Latest Headlines
Aliyah (immigration) wave -- if not now, when?!
US Posture of Deterrence and Islamic Terrorism
The last chance for the middle class
Israel in Gaza and an Upside Down World
Don't Cry, for us Israelis

A Dinosaur of Education - a blog by James Fabiano.
Shobe Studios
Wysong Foods - Pets and People Too

Google
 
Web magic-city-news.com