Magic City Morning Star

Advertising | RSS Feed | About Us 

Last Updated: Oct 13, 2013 - 12:38:22 AM 

An eclectic mix of news and information
Staff Login
Donate towards our web hosting bill!

Front Page 
  News
  -- Local
  -- State
  -- National
  Community
  Business
  -- IRS News
  -- Win at Work
  Education
  -- History
  Tech Notes
  Entertainment
  -- Comics
  International
  -- R.P. BenDedek
  -- Kenneth Tellis
  Outdoors
  Sports
  Features
  -- M Stevens-David
  -- Down the Road
  Christianity
  Today in History
  Opinion
  -- Editor's Desk
  -- Guest Column
  -- Scheme of Things
  -- Michael Devolin
  -- Tom DeWeese
  -- Ed Feulner
  -- Jim Kouri
  -- Julie Smithson
  -- J. Grant Swank
  -- Doug Wrenn
  Letters
  Agenda 21
  Book Reviews
  -- Old Embers
  Notices
  Archive
  Discontinued


Web Directory Reviews
WDR Directory of Directories
Restore The Republic - The Home of the Freedom Movement!

Charles Cutter

Testing the Mettle of Freedom
By Charles Cutter (www.cuttersway.com)
Dec 23, 2004 - 6:57:00 PM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page
In a widely-publicized interview last year, General Tommy Franks - who led the U.S. military invasion of Iraq - said that the American people would be inclined to discard our democratic form of government in the event of another major terrorist attack. He speculated that a "massive, casualty-producing event somewhere in the Western world" would prompt "our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country," putting an end to "this grand experiment we call democracy."

General Franks believes that Americans have a fairly shallow commitment to their freedoms. Democracy, it would seem, is only skin-deep; scratch the surface - draw blood - and it withers quickly.

In a widely-publicized event earlier this month, George W. Bush presented General Franks with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

After allowing ourselves a moment to savor the irony, letís examine the national and global implications of General Franksí belief, especially when contrasted with Mr. Bushís policies.

"Today the people of Iraq and Afghanistan are building a secure and permanent democratic future," Mr. Bush said at the awards ceremony, further praising General Franks for having "helped liberate more than 50 million people from two of the worst tyrannies in the world." The general, however, has indicated that democracy cannot survive in the midst of gross violence - even in America, the longest-sustained democracy in the history of the world. How, then, can we hope to instill a democratic foundation in countries that have no such history, and are subjected to horrific attacks on an almost daily basis?

Mr. Bush, at his December 20th press conference: "[The enemies of freedom] know that a democratic Iraq will be a decisive blow to their ambitions, because free people will never choose to live in tyranny." The emphasis here is added to make a point: Mr. Bushís expressed sentiments are directly at odds with those of General Franks. The general believes a free people can quickly become a fearful people, and then willingly choose a military dictatorship.

Itís worth noting that Americans have not hesitated to inflict massive, casualty-producing events on other nations without abandoning their general adherence to democracy. (Think Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki.) But causing that level of violence is a far cry from experiencing it firsthand, and many of our reactions to September 11, 2001, have not been admirable. Virtually overnight we saw the passage of the Patriot Act and the erosion of the Bill of Rights. Some may argue that these are rational responses to wartime crises - but keep in mind, Mr. Bush and his minions have made it clear that the "war on terrorism" is a perpetual war; there is no end in sight. We can assume, then, that the curtailment of civil liberties will also be perpetual.

As for our military response: Letís put aside, for now, the Bush administrationís true rationale for invading Iraq. Why did a majority of Americans tolerate it? Itís possible that, for the American public, the Afghan war didnít fulfill the lust for 9/11 vengeance. Bombing a stone-age country back into the stone-age doesnít sate oneís appetite for revenge - and our failure to capture Osama bin Laden didnít help matters any - so we accepted expanding the "war on terror" to a convenient, oil-rich target.

Bush & Co. have been eager to play on our emotions, perpetuating fantasies of vast WMD stockpiles and the non-existent partnership between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. Many Americans still believe Iraq played a key role in the 9/11 attacks, and this administration continues to fan the flame; as recently as Wednesday, General Richard Meyers - Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff - said the recent attack in Mosul was "the responsibility of insurgents, the same insurgents who attacked on 9/11Ö"

But - in the absence of WMDs and an Iraq/al-Queda connection - the current rhetoric leans primarily toward the overthrow of Saddam Hussein as a goal unto itself. Said Mr. Bush: "One of the highest distinctions of history is to be called a liberator, and Tommy Franks will always carry that title."

So now we are now purportedly trying to instill democratic governments in Afghanistan, Iraq, and beyond. But whatís the point? If General Franks is right - if democracy is indeed so fragile - isnít the effort at spreading it worldwide a futile endeavor? Is it simply impossible for democratic values to be sufficiently internalized to counteract the weaker aspects of human nature?

Saul Levittís 1959 play The Andersonville Trial dramatizes the war-crimes trial of Henry Wirz, Confederate commander of a POW camp where 14,000 Union prisoners died. In it, Mr. Levitt confronts similar issues, and concludes with questions rather than answers: "Men will go on as they are, most of them, subject to fears - and so, subject to powers and authorities. And how are we to change that slavery? When itís of manís very natureÖWe redecorate the beast in all sorts of political coats, hoping that we change him, but is he to be changed?"

General Tommy Franks, winner of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, would say "no."

And heís probably right.


© Copyright 2002-2013 by Magic City Morning Star

Top of Page

Charles Cutter
Latest Headlines
Democrats to the Rescue (Cue Laughter)
Bush and His Gang
An Attack on the King
Alito's Dark Vision of the World
The End of the World (Hopefully)

A Dinosaur of Education - a blog by James Fabiano.
Shobe Studios
Wysong Foods - Pets and People Too

Google
 
Web magic-city-news.com