Published by R.P. BenDedek with permission from Dr. Tony Keys', this article is an edited excerpt from Dr. Key's book: 'Growing Future Leaders'. Whilst the book is primarily aimed at Christians, the organizational and business principles contained in it make it a valuable tool for all business leaders. (Other Extracts in this Series.)
Directive Leadership (External Locus of Control)
In the last article (Supportive Leadership Behaviours) it was pointed out that one of the most effective
ways to empower people to become exemplary followers and exemplary
leaders is through path-goal leadership.
Path-goal leadership maintains that the leader determines their
behavior towards the follower based on the follower's maturity and
experience. From this assessment, path-goal leadership provides the
coaching, guidance, support and rewards necessary for the effective
performance of followers.
In general, path-goal leadership will choose one or more of the
following four leadership behaviors that are found to be appropriate to
the follower's experience, maturity, perceived ability and locus of
control. This will help them to become exemplary followers and leaders.
In this article we look at the Second of the Four Leadership behaviours.
B. Directive Leadership (External Locus of Control)
Directive leadership can transform would-be superstars into dynamic
team leaders. Michael Jordan, the great basketball player played for the
'The Bulls'. Coach, Phil Jackson, noticed that the team was dominated
by Jordan's talent. There was no synergy, no drive, in any of the other
team players. The coach encouraged Michael Jordan to develop
team-oriented skills to inspire and empower others to do better. As
Michael Jordan did this, the team went from being a purposeless group to
an empowered team. Michael Jordan went from being a superstar to a
leader.
An example of the failure of directive leadership to bring about
transformational can be found in Mikhail Gorbachev's 'Perestroika'.
Following decades of communist oppression, the nation was largely
comprised of passive, conformist and pragmatist followers who lacked any
form of initiative or sense of responsibility. Gorbachev failed to see
that this group of people needed a directive style of leadership - a
leader who would tell them exactly what to do. He was unable to
collectively mobilize his future leaders to implement his vision of
change.
All followers need some sort of direction especially in times of
crises or in ambiguous situations. Directive leadership involves telling
the followers what is expected of them, how and when it is to be done.
It also establishes and maintains patterns of communication, explains
assignments, rules and expectations to followers who have an external
locus of control.
It is very important that the leader using the directive leadership
style carefully determine which type of direction should be given and
when it should be given. Timing is everything.
The leader who uses the directive leadership style needs skills in
order to empower followers who have an external locus of control.
a. Two-way communication: The leader must be able to explain
assignments, rules and procedures and be able to listen to the follower
and give the follower positive feedback on their performance. Phil
Jackson, The Bull's coach, demonstrated this in his interaction with
Michael Jordan. On the other hand, what is interesting about Mikhail
Gorbachev is that while his public image gave the impression that he was
a good communicator and listener of the people (Time magazine in the
1980's crowned him 'Man of the Decade') he met with opposition from his
followers and future leaders who went from passive, conformist and
pragmatist followers to alienated followers not because his policies
were new but rather because they were unformed.
No-one knew what to do and, in a society that for decades had been
used to being told what to do, this was a disaster. The lack of
effective communication opened the door for the New Lion King Syndrome
to come into play and Mikhail Gorbachev was replaced by the lion of
Russia, Boris Yeltsin.
b. Competence or Expertise: The leader must be physically able to
demonstrate the task and guide the follower without 'lording it over'
him/her. Followers with an external locus of control look for the leader
to have expert power.
Mikhail Gorbachev had in implementing his transformational changes
was that he was unable to demonstrate expert power. His training in the
rigid hierarchical state-party system.
c. Self-confident, not overbearing: Followers with an external locus
of control are looking for leaders who are decisive and who do not
express any self-doubt.
Situations for Directive Leadership
It is suitable within a group with a high degree of task
interdependence in which they must co-ordinate their activities with
others.
It is used where there is a need for direct communication between
the leader and followers or between followers and a community service
being offered.
It works when followers are new at their jobs and need guidance from
the leader about effective work methods and the leader is the one who
has the expertise. In highly-structured organizations where the tasks
and procedures are clearly defined, followers will resent a directive
style of leadership beyond the initial clarification of the task.
The directive style of leadership is welcome as a means of completing the task where followers have a high need for achievement.
It is an effective strategy in reducing bureaucracy and stress levels within an organization.
Effects of Directive Leadership on Followers
Most people welcome some sort of structure and predictability in
their lives as it allows them to concentrate on accomplishing important
tasks. This is of particular importance for followers who have an
external locus of control and become disorientated in ambiguous
situations.
There are four positive effects of the directive leadership style on followers:
1. Directive leadership will increase this type of follower's job
satisfaction. This brings structure and direction, which is particularly
relevant if the work environment is not highly structured or if the
organization is going through transformational change. It clarifies the
follower's role. This results in a higher performance and productivity
from followers and improved departmental effectiveness.
2. When directive leadership is combined with supportive leadership,
it reduces stress and burn-out levels as well as turnover amongst
followers.
3. It increases group cohesion, a strong 'we' feeling amongst
members. Felt-closeness is often reported amongst group members. It is
interesting to note in Nehemiah Chapter 2 Verse 18 the strong sense of
felt-closeness amongst the people of Jerusalem as they set about to
rebuild the walls. The people said: "Let us arise and build."
4. Based on clear expectations, followers develop a stronger focus
and motivation to achieve the organization's mission and vision.
Factors that will Replace Directive Leadership
One way to reduce or replace the need for a directive leadership
style is to establish autonomous work teams. These teams need to operate
in an environment where there is a certain amount of predictability
relating to specific procedures used in performing tasks. Such teams
need to be provided with the authority to make and implement
work-related decisions and strategies to accomplish the team's
objectives. They also need feedback.
May God Grant You Direction in Leadership
Dr. Tony Keys
Brisbane, Australia.
Email:trinitylead@uq.net.au
Copyright 2011
The Trinity Institute of Leadership Inc.
Growing Future Leaders
- The Enormous Potential of Followers - Published 2006 by CRS
Publishing, Unit 9, 147 Marshalltown Rd, Grovedale, Victoria 3216,
Australia.
Unless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the NKJV Holy Bible
Dr. Tony Keys' Articles - Writers Journal K.C.
Christian Books on Leadership Various Authors
Barclay, William 1975, The Gospel of John, Saint Andrew Press, Edinburgh
House, Robert (1996) Path-Goal Theory of Leadership: Lessons, Legacy, and A Refomulated Theory. Leadership Quarterly 1996.
Howell & Costley 2001, Effective Leadership, Prentice Hall, p.56
Pastor Tony Key's
professional career includes extensive experience in leadership
positions in non-profit organisations, ministry, education, industry and
churches.
He has been actively involved in a
vast range of leadership roles, which includes experience as the
Director of two Christian tertiary education centres, Church Pastor,
Assistant Principal of a non-profit Christian School, Factory Manager,
Youth Worker, Crusade Co-ordinator, and an administrator for a theatre
company.
He has travelled extensively
throughout Australia and the world, preaching and ministering in
churches as well as conducting leadership seminars for churches, bible
colleges, missionary and not-for-profit organisations and meeting in a
consulting role with church leaders.