Magic City Morning Star

Advertising | RSS Feed | About Us 

Last Updated: Oct 13, 2013 - 12:38:22 AM 

An eclectic mix of news and information
Staff Login
Donate towards our web hosting bill!

Front Page 
  -- Local
  -- State
  -- National
  -- IRS News
  -- Win at Work
  -- History
  Tech Notes
  -- Comics
  -- R.P. BenDedek
  -- Kenneth Tellis
  -- M Stevens-David
  -- Down the Road
  Today in History
  -- Editor's Desk
  -- Guest Column
  -- Scheme of Things
  -- Michael Devolin
  -- Tom DeWeese
  -- Ed Feulner
  -- Jim Kouri
  -- Julie Smithson
  -- J. Grant Swank
  -- Doug Wrenn
  Agenda 21
  Book Reviews
  -- Old Embers

Web Directory Reviews
WDR Directory of Directories
Restore The Republic - The Home of the Freedom Movement!

Bud Landry

History of the Fully Informed jury
By Bud Landry
Mar 30, 2005 - 7:17:00 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Is the fully informed Jury part of our U.S. Constitution?
Yes, it dates back to before the days of the signing of our Constitution.  Many famous people have noted this as one of our inherent constitutional rights:
Lysander Spooner "An Essay on The Trial By Jury;" 1852

"For more than six hundred years-that is, since the Magna Carta, in 1215, there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right , and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless on violating, or resisting the execution of such laws."
"WE THE PEOPLE," must relearn a desperately needed lesson in civics.  The truth of whether or not we have a constitutional right to a Fully Informed Jury has been answered by many testimonies and historical events; 
"The jury has the right to judge of both the law as well as the fact in controversy.
John Jay, 1st Chief Justice- U.S supreme Court 1789.
"The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts."
Samuel Chase, U.S,supreme Court Justice,1796- Signer of the Unaminous Declaration of Independence.
"The jury has the right to bring a verdict in the teeth of both law and fact.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, U.S.supreme Court Justice, 1902.
"The law itself is on trial quite as much as the cause which is to be decided."
Harlan F. Stone, 12th Chief Justice, U.S.supreme Court, 1941.
"The pages of history shine on instances of the juries excercise of it's perogative to disregard the instructions of the judge.
U.S.vs Dougherty, 473F 2nd 1113, 1139, 1972.
The Judiciary Committee in Augusta had all this information before it on Mar 16th when they unaminously decided to keep secret the fact their constituents had a right to the knowedge of Fully Informed Jury rights.  While THEY apparently thought they had the honesty and ability to act as jurors with this knowedge they said their constituents did not.  They apparently do not trust their neighbors or their constituents.
Bud Landry can be contacted at

© Copyright 2002-2013 by Magic City Morning Star

Top of Page

Bud Landry
Latest Headlines
A Puzzle
The Liberty Committee Says
The Fully Informed Jury and Government Oppression
How Our Legislators Think

A Dinosaur of Education - a blog by James Fabiano.
Shobe Studios
Wysong Foods - Pets and People Too